I am
often asked questions related to who supports or opposes our form of
recreation. The questions asked and my answers given cover a wide range of
issues, but one of the biggest threats to our form of recreation is additional
wilderness designations. I have decided to compile some of the information to
elaborate further on the wilderness issue in this article.
Our
members should all be aware by now, that
Additional
wilderness can be proposed in many ways; through Forest Service Plan Revisions
that may include Recommended Wilderness Areas (currently a huge issue in
How does this process work you may ask? Whichever party controls
the House gets to appoint all of the committee chairs, including the Chair of
the committee that will determine which wilderness bills will be allowed to go
forward for a full House vote (this process is basically the same in the
Senate). If the controlling party (currently the Democrats control the House
and Senate) want a bill to go forward for a full vote of the House or Senate,
the Chair will allow the committee to vote on the bill. If the committee vote
passes, the bill will then move out of the committee for a full vote of the
House or Senate. On the other hand, if the Chair does not want a bill that may
be proposed by the other party to go forward for a full vote of the House or
Senate, the Chair will just kill the bill in the committee by not allowing a
committee vote. If a bill does make it out of the committee and is passed by
the House and Senate, the bill will then go to the President for his/her
signature. If the President does not like the bill for various reasons, he/she can
just veto the bill. The bill then goes back to Congress
for possible changes the President might like to see, but if Congress can get 2/3 of the House and Senate to vote
for the bill as previously written, then the President has no choice but to
sign the bill and the bill will then becomes law.
As 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
These bills range widely in the amount of new proposed wilderness
acres, but the worst wilderness bill in this Congress is hands down H.R.1975.
Most of you should recall our H.R.1975 SAWS Alert from
last October. This bill is the grand daddy of all wilderness bills, and if
enacted into law would designate over 21 million acres of wilderness in the
states of
Dave
Hurwitz
Snowmobile
Copyright © 2008 Snowmobile
Permission
is granted to distribute this information in whole or in part, as long as
Snowmobile Alliance of Western States (
If
you are not yet a member of
A list of just a few
of the wilderness bills in the current 110th Congress and who
supports them!
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1975
H.R.1975:
To designate certain National Forest System lands and public lands under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior in the States of Idaho, Montana,
Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming as wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, wildland recovery areas, and biological connecting
corridors, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Carolyn
Maloney [D-NY] Cosponsors (139)
Bill Text: Summary
| Full
Text
9
Republicans; 130 Democrats
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill -
This measure - introduced by Reps.
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Christopher Shays (R-CT) on 4/20/07 - would
designate over 22 million acres of wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, national
park and preserve study areas, wild land recovery areas, and biological
connecting corridors on certain public lands in the States of Idaho, Montana,
Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming. The bill currently has 138 House
co-sponsors. A hearing was held in the House su
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-39
H.R. 39: Udall-Eisenhower Arctic Wilderness Act
To
preserve the Arctic coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,
Alaska, as wilderness in recognition of its extraordinary natural ecosystems
and for the permanent good of present and future generations of Americans.
Sponsor: Rep. Edward Markey
[D-MA] Cosponsors (149)
7
Republicans; 142 Democrats
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2316
S.
2316: A bill to designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as
wilderness
Sponsor: Sen. Joseph
Lieberman [I-CT] Cosponsors (27)
Bill Text: Summary
| Full
Text
1
Independent, 26 Democrats (including Sen. Obama and Sen. Biden)
The
Wilderness Society statement on these two bills on ANWR -
The Udall-Eisenhower
Arctic Wilderness Act would designate the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain of the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as Wilderness. Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced
the measure in the House on
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-226
House Vote On Passage: S. 2739:
Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 (which included the Wild Sky
Wilderness in WA State)
Vote Number: House Vote #226
in 2008 [primary source]
Date:
Result: Passed
Related Bill: S. 2739: Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008
Sponsor: Sen. Jeff Bingaman
[D-NM]
70
Republicans; 221 Democrats
The
Wilderness Society statement on this new law (Public Law No.110-299) -
The [Wild Sky
Wilderness] legislation was enacted into law on
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1919
H.R. 1919:
To
designate as wilderness certain Federal portions of the red rock canyons of the
Colorado Plateau and the Basin and
Sponsor: Rep. Maurice
Hinchey [D-NY] Cosponsors (159)
Bill Text: Summary | Full Text
8
Republicans; 151 Democrats
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill -
On
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-647
S. 647: Lewis and Clark Mount Hood Wilderness Act of 2007
A bill
to designate certain land in the State of
Sponsor: Sen. Ron Wyden
[D-OR]
Cosponsors [as of 2008-08-31]
Bill Text: Summary
| Full Text
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill -
On 2/15/07, Senators Ron Wyden
(D-OR) and Gordon Smith (R-OR) introduced the Lewis and Clark Mount Hood
Wilderness Act of 2007 (S. 647) to permanently protect nearly 129,000 acres of
wilderness on Mount Hood and in the Columbia River Gorge. Their proposal also
would grant Wild and Scenic River protections to an additional 79.6 miles of
rivers in Oregon and create more than 34,000 acres of Mount Hood National
Recreation Areas, which would provide access for mountain biking and other
diverse recreational opportunities, while allowing forest health projects to be
completed where necessary. On
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3513
H.R. 3513: Copper Salmon Wilderness Act of 2008
To
amend the Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984 to designate the Copper Salmon Wilderness
and to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the North
and South Forks of the Elk River in the State of Oregon as wild or scenic
rivers, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Peter DeFazio
[D-OR]
Cosponsors [as of 2008-08-30]
Bill Text: Summary
| Full Text
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill -
This measure was introduced on
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-222
H.R. 222:
To
promote the economic development and recreational use of National Forest System
lands and other public lands in central Idaho, to designate the Boulder-White
Cloud Management Area to ensure the continued management of certain National
Forest System lands and Bureau of Land Management lands for recreational and
grazing use and conservation and resource protection, to add certain National
Forest System lands and Bureau of Land Management lands in central Idaho to the
National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Michael
Simpson [R-ID] (no cosponsors)
Bill Text: Summary | Full Text
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill -
Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) introduced
the
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6162
H.R. 6162: Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area
and
To
establish the Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area and the Dominguez
Canyon Wilderness Area.
Sponsor: Rep. John Salazar
[D-CO]
Cosponsors [as of 2008-08-31]
Bill Text: Summary
| Full Text
The Wilderness
Society statement on this bill -
On
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3756
H.R. 3756:
To designate certain lands in the State of
Sponsor: Rep. Diana DeGette
[D-CO] (no cosponsors)
Bill Text: Summary | Full Text
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill –
The bill would designate nearly
1.6 million acres of Wilderness in western
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-3069
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6156
S. 3069/ H.R. 6156: Eastern
Sierra and
A bill to designate certain land
as wilderness in the State of
S. 3069
Sponsor: Sen. Barbara Boxer
[D-CA]
Cosponsors
[as of 2008-09-17]
Bill Text: Summary
| Full
Text
H.R. 6156
Sponsor: Rep. Howard McKeon
[R-CA]
Cosponsors
[as of 2008-09-12]
Bill Text: Summary
| Full
Text
The
Wilderness Society statement on this bill –
On 5/22/08, Representative Buck
McKeon (R-CA) and Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) introduced the Eastern Sierra
and Northern San Gabriel Wild Heritage Act that would designate as wilderness
472,804 acres in California’s Mono and Inyo Counties and establish more than 45
miles of the Owens River Headwaters and Amargosa
River as Wild and Scenic Rivers. The bill also designates 42,000 acres of
wilderness in
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-493
S. 493:
A bill to designate certain public land as wilderness and
certain rivers as wild and scenic rivers in the State of California, to
designate Salmon Restoration Areas, to establish the Sacramento River National
Recreation Area and Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen. Barbara Boxer
[D-CA] (no cosponsors)
Bill Text: Summary | Full Text
Info on
this bill from The Wilderness Society –
This bill, introduced on