Tester's landmark
forest jobs bill to get Senate hearing December 17th
Comment Deadline:
Contact the
Why should
snowmobilers be concerned about S.1470?
Please be aware
should Montana Senator Tester's bill S. 1470 advance from U.S. Congressional
committee and become law it will not only affect Montana but may set a
precedent for the future of snowmobiling access in other states.
The end result of this bill is
1.1 million acres of new wildernss or de-facto
wilderness in
Abbreviated content from a letter submitted by Montana
To the snowmobilers of
Have your heard about the wave of the future in how forests might
be managed?
IF not, you should be aware that
There are some very interesting sections of the bill that could earn support
for those that would like to see our forests returned to a healthy state but
this is an all or nothing bill when it comes to accepting all or adding more
wilderness to get anything to play through for any other interest. On the other
hand those timber components are short-term. 10-15 years at best, and
recreation-well that's considered to be a "gift" to recreationists to
gain support. There are other interests such as livestock, ranching,
mining and just plain old grass roots county governments that see a loss in
revenues in the future to fund education and transportation. The media
chooses to minimize those views. It has not been made public knowledge of
how the few snowmobile clubs and motorized factions that have supposedly signed
on in support, signed on to support projects in their local areas not knowing
how it would affect the entire Southwest section of Montana or were told that
the overall acceptance of the bill was nothing they should be concerned
about.
Let's not fix something that's not broken. Cross Country and Back
Country travel by snowmobiles has existed in many of these areas for
generations. All of those that snowmobile do not just ride established
trails. Snowmobile use should continue to be allowed at the levels that access
currently exists.
...Senator Tester's staff have also
made statements that the areas designated for wilderness in the BDNF are the
same as what appears in the pending current Beaverhead DeerLodge
National Forest FEIS. Again a misrepresentation as a
number of areas in the bill are not recommended for wilderness in the
FEIS including the nationally recognized
http://tester.senate.gov/Legislation/upload/forest_jobs_and_recreation_act.pdf
Senator Tester had brought some positive actions forward for
Janine
Stewart, Montana
Please use any information from content of the letter and these additional
points of reference to offer to the committee and Senator Tester with regard to
snowmobile access:
· The bill has a severe and negative impact on the snowmobile
recreation community by eliminating access for back country and off trail snowmobile
riding that has existed for at least 30 years.
· Many areas designated as wilderness in this bill do not meet the
true definition of wilderness.
· Year-round losses of livelihood and enjoyment will result.
· Senator Tester's office staff has made statements that the intent
of the bill is to leave snowmobile access as it currently exists but no wording
changes have been offered to the public about those changes.
· Transparency has been non-existent with the drafting of S.1470
Senator Tester's wilderness bill a-k-a
"Forest Jobs and Recreation Act of
2009"
· Communities like West Yellowstone, Montana that have experienced
business closures every year with the snowmobile cutbacks affecting Yellowstone
National Park, which include the recently announced snowmobile entry cutback
again this year.
· Why is this bill necessary to provide for timber
harvest? Existing laws, policies and procedures allow for
responsible multiple-use of the forest.
· How does a bill that is based on a 10-year-life with regard to the
jobs in the bill provide for the future of
· What prevents groups from filing law suits against timber
harvest? The Montana Wilderness Association claims their input will
prevent this. How is that possible?
· Wilderness is forever, there is no "future generation
management", and it will not go back to any prospect of ever being
utilized for multiple-use.
· In this day of budget concerns, what costs will taxpayers be
subject to with the implementation of this bill?
What can you do?
Please call, mail, e-mail or Fax your opinion
to the Energy
and Natural Resources Committee prior to
Energy and Natural Resources Committee
304
The link to send an e-mail message to the committee:
http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
and how to contact individual
members:
http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=About.Members
|
Committee Members |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Democrats |
Republicans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Here is a link to previous information from
http://www.snowmobile-alliance.org/Action_Alerts/09/SAWS_News_-_MT_Senator_Announces_Forest_Jobs_and_Recreation_Act.htm
Janine
Dave Hurwitz,
Scott Chapman,
Copyright © 2009 Snowmobile
Permission is granted to distribute this information in whole
or in part, as long as Snowmobile
______________________________________________________________
http://tester.senate.gov/Newsroom/pr_120209_fjrahearing.cfm
Tester's landmark forest jobs bill to get
Senate hearing Senator calls December 17 hearing 'an important step forward'
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
(
"Getting a Senate hearing is a key hurdle for any legislation,"
Tester said. "But there's still a long road ahead to get this bill
passed so we can put folks back to work, safeguard our outdoor areas and create
new recreational opportunities."
A Senate Energy and Natural Resources subcommittee will hold a hearing on the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act on
December 17.
During the hearing, senators will hear testimony about what the bill does and
why it should pass. It is unknown who will testify at the hearing, but
Tester expects several witnesses from