Wild Sky Wilderness (S 152 and HR 851)
in
Comments should be
sent to your
This year, during the 109th
Congress, is the third year the Wild Sky Wilderness bills have been introduced
by Senator Patty Murray (D, WA) and Rep. Rick Larsen (D, WA-2). The Senate bill
has passed both times but the house bill has died in the House Resource
Committee thanks to Rep. Richard Pombo (R, CA-11) We are hopeful that with help
from multiple-use recreationists across the country, the third time will not be
the charm.
The Wild Sky Wilderness, if enacted by Congress, would encompass 106,000
acres of Mount
Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (MBSNF)
land near Index, Washington. Thousands of these acres do not even meet the
qualifications of the Wilderness Act of 1964 (see references below). A portion
of this act states “An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this
Act an area of undeveloped Federal land… which (1) generally appears to have been
affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work
substantially unnoticeable”. If
you would like to read more of the details of these two bills, go to the Thomas
web site at: http://thomas.loc.gov/ and in
the search field key in either S 152 or HR 851 and press enter.
A few points you may want to consider in your comment letter:
This area contains popular snowmobile, motorcycle, mountain bike, and
automobile camping areas. These areas would become closed to this form of
recreation as they are not allowed in wilderness areas.
The land mass in
According to Gary Paull, MBSNF Wilderness
& Trails Coordinator, this proposal would include:
Wilderness designation
allows very few forest management practices. Catastrophic forest fires are left
to burn uncontrolled, trails must be maintained by primitive means and invasive
species are left to multiple with minimum controls available.
Be both polite and factual
with your letters, and be sure to address your Congressman or Congresswoman as
“Honorable” in your salutation. Use the links below to lookup your
representative if you are unsure who it is.
Lookup your U.S. House
Representative
Representative.reichert@mail.house.gov
- For
those of you in Rep. Dave Reichert’s
I would also encourage you
to send a copy of your letter to:
Chairman Richard Pombo
Committee on Resources
resources.committee@mail.house.gov
Dave Hurwitz
Snowmobile Alliance
of Western States
Copyright © 2005 Snowmobile
Permission is
granted to distribute this information in whole or in part, as long as
Snowmobile Alliance of Western States (
http://www.snowmobile-alliance.org.
________________________________________________________________
Reference publications regarding Wild Sky – rather interesting that the size of the proposal
has remained at 106,000 acres, but the amount of acres that do not meet the
definition for wilderness seems to keep getting smaller each year. How can that
be?
Everett
Herald (02/17/05) – “Opponents contend that some 16,000 acres have already
been spoiled by logging and mining roads, and want those areas excluded. Murray
and Larsen say a unique part of the proposal is that the measure would protect
lower-elevation salmon spawning grounds, including the 16,000 acres”
Associated
Press (02/16/05) – “The plan includes 13,000 acres that contain several
former logging roads and other marks of human intrusion - marks that House
Resources Chairman Richard Pombo says conflict with the 1964 Wilderness Act”
Mark
Rey, Under Secretary, USDA -
(Testimony 07/22/04) “The Department has significant concerns with
approximately 16,000 acres. These acres would not be considered suitable
for wilderness designation under the provisions of the 1964 Wilderness Act or
under existing Forest Service regulations and planning direction…”
Abigail Kimbell, Associate Deputy Chief, FS, USDA (Testimony
07/30/02) “The Department has significant concerns with approximately
36,000 acres of the 106,000 acres proposed for wilderness designation. These
acres would not be considered suitable for wilderness designation under the
provisions of the 1964 Wilderness Act or under existing Forest Service
regulations…”